HABER MERKEZ\u0130-\u00a0Anayasa Mahkemesi, S\u00fbr\u2019daki soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda vurulan Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un katledilmesine dair yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda \u2018ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine\u2019 karar verdi. \u00c7at\u0131\u015fma kan\u0131t\u0131 olmayan dosyada, Rozerin’in katledilmesi \u201cme\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa\u201d kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n
Amed\u2019in S\u00fbr il\u00e7esinde ilan edilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi 8 Ocak 2016\u2019da vurulan ve cenazesi aylar sonra ailesine verilen 17 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne dair yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci devam ediyor. Soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda, Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu\u201d iddia edilerek \u201ckovu\u015fturmaya yer yoktur\u201d karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ve yap\u0131lan itirazlar da reddedilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Derne\u011fi (\u0130HD) Amed \u015eubesi, bunun \u00fczerine \u201cya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ihlali\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle 18 Kas\u0131m 2020 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne (AYM) ba\u015fvurdu. AYM de Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu\u201d iddias\u0131nda \u0131srar ederek, \u201cya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini\u201d savundu.<\/p>\n
Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un polislerle girdi\u011fi \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmada hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken, \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmaya dair herhangi bir delil kararda yer almad\u0131. Kararda, Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un \u201cAnayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde yer alan me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa h\u00e2li alt\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d ve m\u00fcdahalenin orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Etkili soru\u015fturman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de iddia eden AYM, \u201c\u00c7at\u0131\u015fmalara kat\u0131lan g\u00f6revlilerin tespiti ile ifadelerinin al\u0131nmamas\u0131 etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yerine getirilmesi gereken zorunlu ve faydal\u0131 bir delil toplama i\u015flemi olarak de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir. Nitekim ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131 incelenirken a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131ndaki deliller Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un ayaklanman\u0131n bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve silahl\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa \u015fartlar\u0131 alt\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu tespitlere ve soru\u015fturmada ula\u015f\u0131lan benzer sonuca g\u00f6re toplanan deliller, olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f; kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi anlam\u0131nda mutlak zorunlu ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir\u201d ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n
\u2018AYM, devletin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenlik tezini esas al\u0131yor\u2019\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Dava avukatlar\u0131ndan Abdullah Zeytun, \u201cAYM, devletin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenlik tezini esas al\u0131yor. Mahkeme, Rozerin\u2019in bir \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu varsay\u0131m\u0131 ile hareket ederek, olaydaki g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n \u2018me\u015fru amaca ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in mutlak zorunlu ve orant\u0131l\u0131\u2019 oldu\u011funa kanaat getirmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor. Karar\u0131, AYM\u2019nin soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutumu ile paralel bir karar olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcyorum\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n Yasaklar s\u00fcrecinde hukukun ask\u0131ya al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen Zeytun, \u201cRozerin \u00c7ukur da bir K\u00fcrt olarak bu ger\u00e7e\u011fin i\u00e7inde katledildi\u201d dedi. Mahkemenin olaylar\u0131 ele al\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin \u201ctek tarafl\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenlik\u00e7i\u201d oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen Abdullah \u00a0Zeytun, \u201cHen\u00fcz 17 ya\u015f\u0131nda, \u00fczerinde okul \u00fcniformas\u0131 olan bir gencin kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerine kar\u015f\u0131 nas\u0131l bir \u00f6l\u00fcmc\u00fcl tehlike te\u015fkil etti\u011fine dair net bir kan\u0131t yokken, temel hukuk kriterleri varsay\u0131mlar \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendiriliyor. Bu da devletin anlat\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 onaylam\u0131\u015f durumda. AYM\u2019nin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 koruma g\u00f6revinden ziyade, g\u00fcvenlik politikas\u0131na ve perspektifine a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k verdi\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor\u201d ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n \u2018Hukukun temel prensiplerine ayk\u0131r\u0131\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n AYM karar\u0131ndaki \u201csilahl\u0131 eylemlerine devam edece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirmesi neticesinde \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u201d ifadelerinin sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bir tespit oldu\u011funu dile getiren Zeytun, \u201c\u0130leride su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye devam edece\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131yla \u00f6l\u00fcmc\u00fcl g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7as\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131z infaz anlam\u0131na gelir. Oysa burada Rozerin\u2019in teslim olmayaca\u011f\u0131 ve eylemlerine devam edece\u011fi gibi tamamen varsay\u0131ma veya \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eden s\u00f6z ediliyor. Bu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn dayana\u011f\u0131 nedir? Rozerin elinde silahla m\u0131 yakaland\u0131, \u00fczerindeki ate\u015f a\u00e7ma fiili devam m\u0131 ediyordu, yoksa sadece ka\u00e7maya m\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordu? Bu konularda bir cevap yok. Sadece bir varsay\u0131m ile bir insan\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131na son verilmesini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermek hukukun temel prensiplerine ayk\u0131r\u0131\u201d ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n \u2018Kolluk birimlerinin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i bulmuyoruz\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130HD Amed \u015eubesi y\u00f6neticilerinden avukat Yakup G\u00fcven ise, Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi\u201d olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, de\u011ferlendirilse dahi polis-askerlerin sorumlu oldu\u011fu yasalar\u0131n oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131. Yakup G\u00fcven, \u201cSu\u00e7 i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia ediliyorsa dahi ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali, ba\u015fvurulacak bir y\u00f6ntem de\u011fildir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi\u011fi anda polisin hangi t\u00fcr yollar\u0131 kullan\u0131p bir neticeye ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun o an nas\u0131l tehdit te\u015fkil etti\u011finin tespit edilmesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledik. Buna dair somut bir delil yok. Kolluk birimlerinin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i bulmuyoruz\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n Yakup G\u00fcven, Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un polislerle \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddialara dair \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi:<\/p>\n \u201cE\u011fer kollu\u011fun \u00f6yle bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc varsa, ona dair bir tutanak olmas\u0131 gerekiyor. \u0130\u015fte \u2018\u015eu tarihte, \u015fu saatte, \u015fu ki\u015filerin taraf\u0131m\u0131za \u015f\u00f6yle bir sald\u0131r\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut olarak tespit edilmi\u015ftir\u2019 denir. Dosyada \u00f6yle bir tutanak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz.\u201d<\/p>\n Soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen Yakup G\u00fcven, \u201cYa\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaliyle ilgili bir dosyada \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc an, tarih, saate ili\u015fkin veriler olur. T\u00fcm g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131klar\u0131, su\u00e7 delilleri, ifade ve beyanlar hepsi dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunur. Soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda bu a\u015famalar\u0131n hi\u00e7biri yok. Ne bir \u015f\u00fcphelinin beyan\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, ne dosyada bir \u015f\u00fcpheli var\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n A\u0130HM\u2019ye ba\u015fvuru<\/strong><\/p>\n Dosyay\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019ne (A\u0130HM) ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 aktaran Yakup G\u00fcven, \u015f\u00f6yle devam etti:<\/p>\n \u201cCezas\u0131zl\u0131k politikas\u0131 y\u0131llard\u0131r bu halk\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131na bela olmu\u015ftur. Ma\u011fduriyetler daha da b\u00fcy\u00fcm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu sistemin art\u0131k if\u015fa edilmesi, te\u015fhir edilmesi, tarihte bir daha \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fcze \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini beyan ediyoruz. Bu yoldaki m\u00fccadelemizi s\u00fcrd\u00fcrece\u011fiz.\u201d<\/p>\n Rukiye Payiz Ad\u0131g\u00fczel\u00a0\\ MA<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" HABER MERKEZ\u0130-\u00a0Anayasa Mahkemesi, S\u00fbr\u2019daki soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda vurulan Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un katledilmesine dair yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda \u2018ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine\u2019 karar verdi. \u00c7at\u0131\u015fma kan\u0131t\u0131 olmayan dosyada, Rozerin’in katledilmesi \u201cme\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa\u201d kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi. Amed\u2019in S\u00fbr il\u00e7esinde ilan edilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi 8 Ocak 2016\u2019da vurulan ve cenazesi aylar sonra ailesine verilen 17 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Rozerin \u00c7ukur\u2019un […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7134,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"","format":"standard","override":[{"template":"1","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"default-sidebar","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"top","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"1","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_post_tag":"1","show_prev_next_post":"1","show_popup_post":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_author_box":"1","show_post_related":"0","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_review":[],"enable_review":"","type":"percentage","name":"","summary":"","brand":"","sku":"","good":[],"bad":[],"score_override":"","override_value":"","rating":[],"price":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"jnews_post_split":{"post_split":[{"template":"1","tag":"h2","numbering":"asc","mode":"normal","first":"0","enable_toc":"0","toc_type":"normal"}]},"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/berru.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sertac-rozerin_0.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7133"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7133\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7135,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7133\/revisions\/7135"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berru.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}